Home  ›  What Art Style Influenced Pablo Picassos Table in Front of the Window

What Art Style Influenced Pablo Picassos Table in Front of the Window

Written By mercredi 4 mai 2022 Add Comment Edit

Early on-20th-century avant-garde art movement

Not to exist dislocated with QBism.

Cubism is an early on-20th-century avant-garde art movement that revolutionized European painting and sculpture, and inspired related movements in music, literature and architecture. In Cubist artwork, objects are analyzed, cleaved up and reassembled in an abstracted form—instead of depicting objects from a single viewpoint, the artist depicts the subject area from a multitude of viewpoints to represent the subject in a greater context.[1] Cubism has been considered the most influential fine art movement of the 20th century.[2] [3] The term is broadly used in association with a broad multifariousness of art produced in Paris (Montmartre and Montparnasse) or nigh Paris (Puteaux) during the 1910s and throughout the 1920s.

The move was pioneered by Pablo Picasso and Georges Braque, and joined by Jean Metzinger, Albert Gleizes, Robert Delaunay, Henri Le Fauconnier, Juan Gris, and Fernand Léger.[4] One primary influence that led to Cubism was the representation of three-dimensional form in the late works of Paul Cézanne.[5] A retrospective of Cézanne'due south paintings had been held at the Salon d'Automne of 1904, current works were displayed at the 1905 and 1906 Salon d'Automne, followed by 2 commemorative retrospectives later his expiry in 1907.[6]

In France, offshoots of Cubism adult, including Orphism, abstruse fine art and later Purism.[7] [eight] The impact of Cubism was far-reaching and broad-ranging. In French republic and other countries Futurism, Suprematism, Dada, Constructivism, Vorticism, De Stijl and Art Deco developed in response to Cubism. Early Futurist paintings hold in common with Cubism the fusing of the by and the present, the representation of different views of the subject area pictured at the same time or successively, likewise called multiple perspective, simultaneity or multiplicity,[9] while Constructivism was influenced past Picasso's technique of constructing sculpture from separate elements.[ten] Other mutual threads between these disparate movements include the faceting or simplification of geometric forms, and the association of mechanization and modern life.

History [edit]

Historians have divided the history of Cubism into phases. In one scheme, the kickoff phase of Cubism, known as Analytic Cubism, a phrase coined past Juan Gris a posteriori,[11] was both radical and influential every bit a short but highly significant art motion betwixt 1910 and 1912 in French republic. A second phase, Synthetic Cubism, remained vital until around 1919, when the Surrealist motion gained popularity. English fine art historian Douglas Cooper proposed another scheme, describing iii phases of Cubism in his book, The Cubist Epoch. According to Cooper there was "Early Cubism", (from 1906 to 1908) when the move was initially adult in the studios of Picasso and Braque; the second phase being called "High Cubism", (from 1909 to 1914) during which fourth dimension Juan Gris emerged every bit an important exponent (after 1911); and finally Cooper referred to "Late Cubism" (from 1914 to 1921) equally the last stage of Cubism as a radical avant-garde movement.[12] Douglas Cooper's restrictive use of these terms to distinguish the work of Braque, Picasso, Gris (from 1911) and Léger (to a lesser extent) implied an intentional value judgement.[five]

Pablo Picasso, 1909–10, Effigy dans un Fauteuil (Seated Nude, Femme nue assise), oil on canvas, 92.i × 73 cm, Tate Modern, London

Proto-Cubism: 1907–1908 [edit]

Cubism burgeoned between 1907 and 1911. Pablo Picasso's 1907 painting Les Demoiselles d'Avignon has often been considered a proto-Cubist piece of work.

In 1908, in his review of Georges Braque's exhibition at Kahnweiler'southward gallery, the critic Louis Vauxcelles called Braque a daring human who despises form, "reducing everything, places and a figures and houses, to geometric schemas, to cubes".[14] [15]

Vauxcelles recounted how Matisse told him at the time, "Braque has simply sent in [to the 1908 Salon d'Automne] a painting fabricated of little cubes".[15] The critic Charles Morice relayed Matisse'south words and spoke of Braque's niggling cubes. The motif of the viaduct at 50'Estaque had inspired Braque to produce three paintings marked past the simplification of form and deconstruction of perspective.[16]

Georges Braque's 1908 Houses at L'Estaque (and related works) prompted Vauxcelles, in Gil Blas, 25 March 1909, to refer to bizarreries cubiques (cubic oddities).[17] Gertrude Stein referred to landscapes made past Picasso in 1909, such as Reservoir at Horta de Ebro, every bit the first Cubist paintings. The first organized group exhibition by Cubists took place at the Salon des Indépendants in Paris during the spring of 1911 in a room called 'Salle 41'; it included works by Jean Metzinger, Albert Gleizes, Fernand Léger, Robert Delaunay and Henri Le Fauconnier, however no works past Picasso or Braque were exhibited.[v]

By 1911 Picasso was recognized every bit the inventor of Cubism, while Braque'southward importance and precedence was argued later, with respect to his treatment of space, book and mass in the L'Estaque landscapes. Merely "this view of Cubism is associated with a distinctly restrictive definition of which artists are properly to be chosen Cubists," wrote the art historian Christopher Greenish: "Marginalizing the contribution of the artists who exhibited at the Salon des Indépendants in 1911 [...]"[5]

The exclamation that the Cubist depiction of space, mass, time, and book supports (rather than contradicts) the flatness of the canvas was fabricated past Daniel-Henry Kahnweiler every bit early on equally 1920,[18] but it was bailiwick to criticism in the 1950s and 1960s, especially by Clement Greenberg.[xix]

Contemporary views of Cubism are complex, formed to some extent in response to the "Salle 41" Cubists, whose methods were too distinct from those of Picasso and Braque to be considered merely secondary to them. Alternative interpretations of Cubism have therefore developed. Wider views of Cubism include artists who were afterward associated with the "Salle 41" artists, east.g., Francis Picabia; the brothers Jacques Villon, Raymond Duchamp-Villon and Marcel Duchamp, who offset in tardily 1911 formed the core of the Department d'Or (or the Puteaux Group); the sculptors Alexander Archipenko, Joseph Csaky and Ossip Zadkine likewise every bit Jacques Lipchitz and Henri Laurens; and painters such as Louis Marcoussis, Roger de La Fresnaye, František Kupka, Diego Rivera, Léopold Survage, Auguste Herbin, André Lhote, Gino Severini (after 1916), María Blanchard (after 1916) and Georges Valmier (after 1918). More than fundamentally, Christopher Green argues that Douglas Cooper'due south terms were "later undermined by interpretations of the work of Picasso, Braque, Gris and Léger that stress iconographic and ideological questions rather than methods of representation."[5]

John Berger identifies the essence of Cubism with the mechanical diagram. "The metaphorical model of Cubism is the diagram: The diagram being a visible symbolic representation of invisible processes, forces, structures. A diagram need non eschew sure aspects of advent but these too will exist treated as signs not every bit imitations or recreations."[20]

Early Cubism: 1909–1914 [edit]

Albert Gleizes, 50'Homme au Balcon, Homo on a Balcony (Portrait of Dr. Théo Morinaud), 1912, oil on canvas, 195.vi × 114.9 cm (77 × 45 one/iv in.), Philadelphia Museum of Art. Completed the same year that Albert Gleizes co-authored the book Du "Cubisme" with Jean Metzinger. Exhibited at Salon d'Automne, Paris, 1912, Armory show, New York, Chicago, Boston, 1913

In that location was a distinct departure between Kahnweiler's Cubists and the Salon Cubists. Prior to 1914, Picasso, Braque, Gris and Léger (to a lesser extent) gained the support of a unmarried committed art dealer in Paris, Daniel-Henry Kahnweiler, who guaranteed them an almanac income for the exclusive right to buy their works. Kahnweiler sold just to a small circle of connoisseurs. His support gave his artists the freedom to experiment in relative privacy. Picasso worked in Montmartre until 1912, while Braque and Gris remained there until afterwards the Outset Earth War. Léger was based in Montparnasse.[5]

In contrast, the Salon Cubists built their reputation primarily past exhibiting regularly at the Salon d'Automne and the Salon des Indépendants, both major non-academic Salons in Paris. They were inevitably more aware of public response and the need to communicate.[v] Already in 1910 a group began to form which included Metzinger, Gleizes, Delaunay and Léger. They met regularly at Henri le Fauconnier's studio near the boulevard du Montparnasse. These soirées often included writers such as Guillaume Apollinaire and André Salmon. Together with other young artists, the group wanted to emphasise a research into course, in opposition to the Neo-Impressionist emphasis on colour.[21]

Louis Vauxcelles, in his review of the 26th Salon des Indépendants (1910), made a passing and imprecise reference to Metzinger, Gleizes, Delaunay, Léger and Le Fauconnier equally "ignorant geometers, reducing the man body, the site, to pallid cubes."[22] [23] At the 1910 Salon d'Automne, a few months later, Metzinger exhibited his highly fractured Nu à la cheminée (Nude), which was subsequently reproduced in both Du "Cubisme" (1912) and Les Peintres Cubistes (1913).[24]

The first public controversy generated by Cubism resulted from Salon showings at the Indépendants during the spring of 1911. This showing past Metzinger, Gleizes, Delaunay, le Fauconnier and Léger brought Cubism to the attention of the general public for the get-go fourth dimension. Amongst the Cubist works presented, Robert Delaunay exhibited his Eiffel Tower, Bout Eiffel (Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum, New York).[25]

The "Cubists" Dominate Paris' Autumn Salon, The New York Times, Oct viii, 1911. Picasso'southward 1908 Seated Woman (Meditation) is reproduced forth with a photograph of the artist in his studio (upper left). Metzinger'southward Baigneuses (1908–09) is reproduced top right. Too reproduced are works by Derain, Matisse, Friesz, Herbin, and a photo of Braque

At the Salon d'Automne of the aforementioned year, in addition to the Indépendants group of Salle 41, were exhibited works past André Lhote, Marcel Duchamp, Jacques Villon, Roger de La Fresnaye, André Dunoyer de Segonzac and František Kupka. The exhibition was reviewed in the Oct 8, 1911 upshot of The New York Times. This article was published a year after Gelett Burgess' The Wild Men of Paris,[26] and two years prior to the Armory Bear witness, which introduced astonished Americans, accepted to realistic art, to the experimental styles of the European avant garde, including Fauvism, Cubism, and Futurism. The 1911 New York Times commodity portrayed works past Picasso, Matisse, Derain, Metzinger and others dated before 1909; non exhibited at the 1911 Salon. The article was titled The "Cubists" Boss Paris' Fall Salon and subtitled Eccentric School of Painting Increases Its Faddy in the Current Fine art Exhibition – What Its Followers Attempt to Practise. [27] [28]

Among all the paintings on exhibition at the Paris Fall Salon none is attracting so much attention as the extraordinary productions of the and then-called "Cubist" school. In fact, dispatches from Paris suggest that these works are hands the main feature of the exhibition. [...]

In spite of the crazy nature of the "Cubist" theories the number of those professing them is fairly respectable. Georges Braque, André Derain, Picasso, Czobel, Othon Friesz, Herbin, Metzinger—these are a few of the names signed to canvases earlier which Paris has stood and at present once more stands in blank amazement.

What do they mean? Have those responsible for them taken leave of their senses? Is it art or madness? Who knows?[27] [28]

Salon des Indépendants [edit]

The subsequent 1912 Salon des Indépendants located in Paris (20 March to 16 May 1912) was marked by the presentation of Marcel Duchamp'southward Nude Descending a Staircase, No. 2, which itself acquired a scandal, even amongst the Cubists. Information technology was in fact rejected by the hanging committee, which included his brothers and other Cubists. Although the piece of work was shown in the Salon de la Department d'Or in Oct 1912 and the 1913 Arsenal Show in New York, Duchamp never forgave his brothers and former colleagues for censoring his work.[21] [29] Juan Gris, a new addition to the Salon scene, exhibited his Portrait of Picasso (Art Institute of Chicago), while Metzinger's two showings included La Femme au Cheval (Woman with a horse) 1911–1912 (National Gallery of Denmark).[30] Delaunay's monumental La Ville de Paris (Musée d'art moderne de la Ville de Paris) and Léger's La Noce, The Wedding (Musée National d'Fine art Moderne, Paris), were also exhibited.

Galeries Dalmau [edit]

In 1912, Galeries Dalmau presented the start declared group exhibition of Cubism worldwide (Exposició d'Art Cubista),[31] [32] [33] with a controversial showing past Jean Metzinger, Albert Gleizes, Juan Gris, Marie Laurencin and Marcel Duchamp (Barcelona, 20 April to 10 May 1912). The Dalmau exhibition comprised 83 works by 26 artists.[34] [35] [36] Jacques Nayral'due south association with Gleizes led him to write the Preface for the Cubist exhibition,[31] which was fully translated and reproduced in the paper La Veu de Catalunya.[37] [38] Duchamp's Nude Descending a Staircase, No. 2 was exhibited for the first time.[39]

Extensive media coverage (in newspapers and magazines) before, during and subsequently the exhibition launched the Galeries Dalmau as a force in the development and propagation of modernism in Europe.[39] While press coverage was extensive, it was not e'er positive. Articles were published in the newspapers Esquella de La Torratxa [40] and El Noticiero Universal [41] attacking the Cubists with a series of caricatures laced with derogatory text.[41] Art historian Jaime Brihuega writes of the Dalmau evidence: "No doubt that the exhibition produced a strong commotion in the public, who welcomed information technology with a lot of suspicion.[42]

Salon d'Automne [edit]

The Cubist contribution to the 1912 Salon d'Automne created scandal regarding the use of government owned buildings, such equally the Yard Palais, to exhibit such artwork. The indignation of the pol Jean Pierre Philippe Lampué made the front page of Le Periodical, 5 October 1912.[43] The controversy spread to the Municipal Council of Paris, leading to a fence in the Chambre des Députés near the use of public funds to provide the venue for such art.[44] The Cubists were defended by the Socialist deputy, Marcel Sembat.[44] [45] [46]

Information technology was confronting this background of public anger that Jean Metzinger and Albert Gleizes wrote Du "Cubisme" (published by Eugène Figuière in 1912, translated to English and Russian in 1913).[47] Amidst the works exhibited were Le Fauconnier's vast composition Les Montagnards attaqués par des ours (Mountaineers Attacked past Bears) now at Rhode Island School of Blueprint Museum, Joseph Csaky'southward Deux Femme, 2 Women (a sculpture now lost), in addition to the highly abstruse paintings by Kupka, Amorpha (The National Gallery, Prague), and Picabia, La Source (The Spring) (Museum of Modern Fine art, New York).

Abstraction and the set up-fabricated [edit]

The virtually extreme forms of Cubism were not those practiced past Picasso and Braque, who resisted total brainchild. Other Cubists, past dissimilarity, especially František Kupka, and those considered Orphists by Apollinaire (Delaunay, Léger, Picabia and Duchamp), accepted abstraction by removing visible subject matter entirely. Kupka'south two entries at the 1912 Salon d'Automne, Amorpha-Fugue à deux couleurs and Amorpha chromatique chaude, were highly abstract (or nonrepresentational) and metaphysical in orientation. Both Duchamp in 1912 and Picabia from 1912 to 1914 developed an expressive and allusive abstraction dedicated to complex emotional and sexual themes. Beginning in 1912 Delaunay painted a series of paintings entitled Simultaneous Windows, followed past a series entitled Formes Circulaires, in which he combined planar structures with bright prismatic hues; based on the optical characteristics of juxtaposed colors his departure from reality in the depiction of imagery was quasi-complete. In 1913–14 Léger produced a serial entitled Contrasts of Forms, giving a similar stress to color, line and class. His Cubism, despite its abstract qualities, was associated with themes of mechanization and modern life. Apollinaire supported these early developments of abstract Cubism in Les Peintres cubistes (1913),[24] writing of a new "pure" painting in which the subject was vacated. But in spite of his use of the term Orphism these works were so different that they defy attempts to place them in a unmarried category.[5]

Also labeled an Orphist past Apollinaire, Marcel Duchamp was responsible for another farthermost development inspired by Cubism. The ready-fabricated arose from a articulation consideration that the work itself is considered an object (just equally a painting), and that information technology uses the textile detritus of the earth (as collage and papier collé in the Cubist construction and Assemblage). The side by side logical footstep, for Duchamp, was to present an ordinary object every bit a self-sufficient work of fine art representing but itself. In 1913 he fastened a bicycle cycle to a kitchen stool and in 1914 selected a bottle-drying rack as a sculpture in its own right.[5]

Section d'Or [edit]

The Section d'Or, likewise known as Groupe de Puteaux, founded by some of the most conspicuous Cubists, was a collective of painters, sculptors and critics associated with Cubism and Orphism, agile from 1911 through about 1914, coming to prominence in the wake of their controversial showing at the 1911 Salon des Indépendants. The Salon de la Section d'Or at the Galerie La Boétie in Paris, October 1912, was arguably the almost important pre-Globe State of war I Cubist exhibition; exposing Cubism to a wide audience. Over 200 works were displayed, and the fact that many of the artists showed artworks representative of their development from 1909 to 1912 gave the exhibition the allure of a Cubist retrospective.[48]

The group seems to have adopted the name Section d'Or to distinguish themselves from the narrower definition of Cubism developed in parallel by Pablo Picasso and Georges Braque in the Montmartre quarter of Paris, and to evidence that Cubism, rather than being an isolated art-class, represented the continuation of a thou tradition (indeed, the golden ratio had fascinated Western intellectuals of diverse interests for at least 2,400 years).[49]

The idea of the Section d'Or originated in the course of conversations betwixt Metzinger, Gleizes and Jacques Villon. The group'southward title was suggested by Villon, subsequently reading a 1910 translation of Leonardo da Vinci's Trattato della Pittura by Joséphin Péladan.

During the late 19th and early 20th centuries, Europeans were discovering African, Polynesian, Micronesian and Native American fine art. Artists such as Paul Gauguin, Henri Matisse, and Pablo Picasso were intrigued and inspired by the stark power and simplicity of styles of those strange cultures. Effectually 1906, Picasso met Matisse through Gertrude Stein, at a fourth dimension when both artists had recently acquired an involvement in primitivism, Iberian sculpture, African art and African tribal masks. They became friendly rivals and competed with each other throughout their careers, perhaps leading to Picasso entering a new menses in his work by 1907, marked by the influence of Greek, Iberian and African art. Picasso's paintings of 1907 take been characterized as Protocubism, as notably seen in Les Demoiselles d'Avignon, the antecedent of Cubism.[13]

The art historian Douglas Cooper states that Paul Gauguin and Paul Cézanne "were particularly influential to the germination of Cubism and peculiarly important to the paintings of Picasso during 1906 and 1907".[50] Cooper goes on to say: "The Demoiselles is more often than not referred to equally the first Cubist picture. This is an exaggeration, for although it was a major outset step towards Cubism it is non yet Cubist. The confusing, expressionist element in it is even contrary to the spirit of Cubism, which looked at the globe in a detached, realistic spirit. Nevertheless, the Demoiselles is the logical picture to take equally the starting point for Cubism, because it marks the birth of a new pictorial idiom, because in it Picasso violently overturned established conventions and considering all that followed grew out of it."[thirteen]

The most serious objection to regarding the Demoiselles as the origin of Cubism, with its evident influence of primitive art, is that "such deductions are unhistorical", wrote the art historian Daniel Robbins. This familiar caption "fails to give adequate consideration to the complexities of a flourishing art that existed just before and during the period when Picasso'south new painting developed."[51] Between 1905 and 1908, a conscious search for a new style caused rapid changes in art across France, Germany, Holland, Italy, and Russian federation. The Impressionists had used a double point of view, and both Les Nabis and the Symbolists (who likewise admired Cézanne) flattened the picture plane, reducing their subjects to unproblematic geometric forms. Neo-Impressionist construction and subject matter, most notably to be seen in the works of Georges Seurat (e.1000., Parade de Cirque, Le Chahut and Le Cirque), was another important influence. There were as well parallels in the development of literature and social thought.[51]

In addition to Seurat, the roots of cubism are to exist found in the 2 distinct tendencies of Cézanne's afterward work: first his breaking of the painted surface into modest multifaceted areas of paint, thereby emphasizing the plural viewpoint given by binocular vision, and second his interest in the simplification of natural forms into cylinders, spheres, and cones. Withal, the cubists explored this concept further than Cézanne. They represented all the surfaces of depicted objects in a single moving-picture show plane, every bit if the objects had all their faces visible at the same fourth dimension. This new kind of depiction revolutionized the way objects could be visualized in painting and art.

The historical written report of Cubism began in the late 1920s, drawing at first from sources of express information, namely the opinions of Guillaume Apollinaire. It came to rely heavily on Daniel-Henry Kahnweiler'southward book Der Weg zum Kubismus (published in 1920), which centered on the developments of Picasso, Braque, Léger, and Gris. The terms "analytical" and "synthetic" which subsequently emerged accept been widely accepted since the mid-1930s. Both terms are historical impositions that occurred after the facts they identify. Neither phase was designated as such at the time corresponding works were created. "If Kahnweiler considers Cubism as Picasso and Braque," wrote Daniel Robbins, "our only fault is in subjecting other Cubists' works to the rigors of that limited definition."[51]

The traditional estimation of "Cubism", formulated post facto every bit a means of understanding the works of Braque and Picasso, has affected our appreciation of other twentieth-century artists. Information technology is difficult to utilise to painters such equally Jean Metzinger, Albert Gleizes, Robert Delaunay and Henri Le Fauconnier, whose cardinal differences from traditional Cubism compelled Kahnweiler to question whether to call them Cubists at all. According to Daniel Robbins, "To suggest that but because these artists developed differently or varied from the traditional pattern they deserved to be relegated to a secondary or satellite role in Cubism is a profound mistake."[51]

The history of the term "Cubism" usually stresses the fact that Matisse referred to "cubes" in connection with a painting by Braque in 1908, and that the term was published twice by the critic Louis Vauxcelles in a similar context. However, the discussion "cube" was used in 1906 by some other critic, Louis Chassevent, with reference not to Picasso or Braque but rather to Metzinger and Delaunay:

"K. Metzinger is a mosaicist like Chiliad. Signac but he brings more precision to the cut of his cubes of color which appear to have been made mechanically [...]".[51] [52] [53]

The disquisitional use of the word "cube" goes back at least to May 1901 when Jean Béral, reviewing the work of Henri-Edmond Cross at the Indépendants in Art et Littérature, commented that he "uses a large and square pointillism, giving the impression of mosaic. 1 even wonders why the artist has not used cubes of solid matter diversely colored: they would make pretty revetments." (Robert Herbert, 1968, p. 221)[53]

The term Cubism did not come into full general usage until 1911, mainly with reference to Metzinger, Gleizes, Delaunay, and Léger.[51] In 1911, the poet and critic Guillaume Apollinaire accepted the term on behalf of a group of artists invited to exhibit at the Brussels Indépendants. The following twelvemonth, in preparation for the Salon de la Section d'Or, Metzinger and Gleizes wrote and published Du "Cubisme" [54] in an endeavor to dispel the confusion raging effectually the give-and-take, and as a major defense of Cubism (which had acquired a public scandal following the 1911 Salon des Indépendants and the 1912 Salon d'Automne in Paris).[55] Clarifying their aims as artists, this work was the first theoretical treatise on Cubism and it still remains the clearest and well-nigh intelligible. The outcome, not solely a collaboration between its two authors, reflected discussions past the circle of artists who met in Puteaux and Courbevoie. Information technology mirrored the attitudes of the "artists of Passy", which included Picabia and the Duchamp brothers, to whom sections of it were read prior to publication.[5] [51] The concept developed in Du "Cubisme" of observing a subject from unlike points in infinite and time simultaneously, i.e., the human activity of moving effectually an object to seize it from several successive angles fused into a unmarried image (multiple viewpoints, mobile perspective, simultaneity or multiplicity), is a generally recognized device used by the Cubists.[56]

The 1912 manifesto Du "Cubisme" past Metzinger and Gleizes was followed in 1913 by Les Peintres Cubistes, a collection of reflections and commentaries by Guillaume Apollinaire.[24] Apollinaire had been closely involved with Picasso first in 1905, and Braque beginning in 1907, but gave as much attending to artists such every bit Metzinger, Gleizes, Delaunay, Picabia, and Duchamp.[v]

The fact that the 1912 exhibition had been curated to show the successive stages through which Cubism had transited, and that Du "Cubisme" had been published for the occasion, indicates the artists' intention of making their piece of work comprehensible to a broad audience (art critics, art collectors, art dealers and the general public). Undoubtedly, due to the great success of the exhibition, Cubism became avant-garde movement recognized as a genre or way in art with a specific common philosophy or goal.[48]

Crystal Cubism: 1914–1918 [edit]

A significant modification of Cubism between 1914 and 1916 was signaled past a shift towards a strong accent on large overlapping geometric planes and apartment surface action. This group of styles of painting and sculpture, specially significant between 1917 and 1920, was practiced past several artists; particularly those under contract with the art dealer and collector Léonce Rosenberg. The tightening of the compositions, the clarity and sense of order reflected in these works, led to its being referred to by the critic Maurice Raynal as 'crystal' Cubism. Considerations manifested past Cubists prior to the outset of World War I—such as the time, dynamism of modern life, the occult, and Henri Bergson's concept of duration—had at present been vacated, replaced past a purely formal frame of reference.[57]

Crystal Cubism, and its associative rappel à fifty'ordre, has been linked with an inclination—by those who served the military and by those who remained in the civilian sector—to escape the realities of the Nifty State of war, both during and direct following the disharmonize. The purifying of Cubism from 1914 through the mid-1920s, with its cohesive unity and voluntary constraints, has been linked to a much broader ideological transformation towards conservatism in both French society and French civilization.[v]

Cubism after 1918 [edit]

The nigh innovative period of Cubism was before 1914[ citation needed ]. After World War I, with the support given by the dealer Léonce Rosenberg, Cubism returned as a central outcome for artists, and continued every bit such until the mid-1920s when its avant-garde condition was rendered questionable by the emergence of geometric abstraction and Surrealism in Paris. Many Cubists, including Picasso, Braque, Gris, Léger, Gleizes, and Metzinger, while developing other styles, returned periodically to Cubism, even well later 1925. Cubism reemerged during the 1920s and the 1930s in the work of the American Stuart Davis and the Englishman Ben Nicholson. In France, however, Cubism experienced a decline beginning in about 1925. Léonce Rosenberg exhibited not only the artists stranded by Kahnweiler's exile just others including Laurens, Lipchitz, Metzinger, Gleizes, Csaky, Herbin and Severini. In 1918 Rosenberg presented a series of Cubist exhibitions at his Galerie de l'Effort Moderne in Paris. Attempts were made by Louis Vauxcelles to argue that Cubism was expressionless, only these exhibitions, forth with a well-organized Cubist testify at the 1920 Salon des Indépendants and a revival of the Salon de la Section d'Or in the same year, demonstrated information technology was notwithstanding alive.[5]

The reemergence of Cubism coincided with the appearance from about 1917–24 of a coherent trunk of theoretical writing by Pierre Reverdy, Maurice Raynal and Daniel-Henry Kahnweiler and, amid the artists, by Gris, Léger and Gleizes. The occasional return to classicism—figurative piece of work either exclusively or alongside Cubist piece of work—experienced past many artists during this catamenia (chosen Neoclassicism) has been linked to the tendency to evade the realities of the war and also to the cultural authority of a classical or Latin image of France during and immediately following the war. Cubism after 1918 can be seen as part of a broad ideological shift towards conservatism in both French gild and civilization. Yet, Cubism itself remained evolutionary both within the oeuvre of private artists, such as Gris and Metzinger, and across the work of artists equally unlike from each other as Braque, Léger and Gleizes. Cubism every bit a publicly debated movement became relatively unified and open to definition. Its theoretical purity fabricated it a judge against which such diverse tendencies as Realism or Naturalism, Dada, Surrealism and abstraction could exist compared.[five]

Diego Rivera, Portrait de Messieurs Kawashima et Foujita, 1914

Influence in Asia [edit]

Japan and Cathay were among the start countries in Asia to be influenced by Cubism. Contact beginning occurred via European texts translated and published in Japanese fine art journals in the 1910s. In the 1920s, Japanese and Chinese artists who studied in Paris, for example those enrolled at the École nationale supérieure des Beaux-Arts, brought back with them both an understanding of modernistic fine art movements, including Cubism. Notable works exhibiting Cubist qualities were Tetsugorō Yorozu's Self Portrait with Red Eyes (1912) and Fang Ganmin'southward Melody in Autumn (1934).[59] [threescore]

Interpretation [edit]

Intentions and criticism [edit]

The Cubism of Picasso and Braque had more a technical or formal significance, and the distinct attitudes and intentions of the Salon Cubists produced different kinds of Cubism, rather than a derivative of their work. "Information technology is by no means clear, in whatever example," wrote Christopher Green, "to what extent these other Cubists depended on Picasso and Braque for their development of such techniques as faceting, 'passage' and multiple perspective; they could well accept arrived at such practices with trivial knowledge of 'truthful' Cubism in its early stages, guided above all by their own understanding of Cézanne." The works exhibited by these Cubists at the 1911 and 1912 Salons extended across the conventional Cézanne-like subjects—the posed model, nonetheless-life and mural—favored by Picasso and Braque to include large-calibration modernistic-life subjects. Aimed at a large public, these works stressed the utilise of multiple perspective and complex planar faceting for expressive result while preserving the eloquence of subjects endowed with literary and philosophical connotations.[5]

In Du "Cubisme" Metzinger and Gleizes explicitly related the sense of time to multiple perspective, giving symbolic expression to the notion of 'duration' proposed past the philosopher Henri Bergson according to which life is subjectively experienced every bit a continuum, with the by flowing into the present and the present merging into the future. The Salon Cubists used the faceted handling of solid and space and furnishings of multiple viewpoints to convey a physical and psychological sense of the fluidity of consciousness, blurring the distinctions between by, present and future. One of the major theoretical innovations made by the Salon Cubists, independently of Picasso and Braque, was that of simultaneity,[5] cartoon to greater or lesser extent on theories of Henri Poincaré, Ernst Mach, Charles Henry, Maurice Princet, and Henri Bergson. With simultaneity, the concept of separate spatial and temporal dimensions was comprehensively challenged. Linear perspective developed during the Renaissance was vacated. The subject thing was no longer considered from a specific point of view at a moment in time, but built following a selection of successive viewpoints, i.due east., as if viewed simultaneously from numerous angles (and in multiple dimensions) with the heart free to roam from i to the other.[56]

This technique of representing simultaneity, multiple viewpoints (or relative motion) is pushed to a high degree of complication in Metzinger'due south Nu à la cheminée, exhibited at the 1910 Salon d'Automne; Gleizes' monumental Le Dépiquage des Moissons (Harvest Threshing), exhibited at the 1912 Salon de la Section d'Or; Le Fauconnier's Abundance shown at the Indépendants of 1911; and Delaunay'southward City of Paris, exhibited at the Indépendants in 1912. These ambitious works are some of the largest paintings in the history of Cubism. Léger's The Wedding, also shown at the Salon des Indépendants in 1912, gave class to the notion of simultaneity by presenting different motifs every bit occurring within a single temporal frame, where responses to the past and present interpenetrate with commonage force. The conjunction of such subject matter with simultaneity aligns Salon Cubism with early Futurist paintings by Umberto Boccioni, Gino Severini and Carlo Carrà; themselves made in response to early Cubism.[ix]

Cubism and modernistic European art was introduced into the United states at the now legendary 1913 Armory Show in New York Urban center, which then traveled to Chicago and Boston. In the Arsenal show Pablo Picasso exhibited La Femme au pot de moutarde (1910), the sculpture Head of a Adult female (Fernande) (1909–10), Les Arbres (1907) amongst other cubist works. Jacques Villon exhibited 7 important and big drypoints, while his brother Marcel Duchamp shocked the American public with his painting Nude Descending a Staircase, No. 2 (1912). Francis Picabia exhibited his abstractions La Danse à la source and La Procession, Seville (both of 1912). Albert Gleizes exhibited La Femme aux phlox (1910) and L'Homme au balcon (1912), ii highly stylized and faceted cubist works. Georges Braque, Fernand Léger, Raymond Duchamp-Villon, Roger de La Fresnaye and Alexander Archipenko also contributed examples of their cubist works.

Cubist sculpture [edit]

Frontal view of the same bronze cast, 40.5 × 23 × 26 cm

These photos were published in Umělecký Mĕsíčník, 1913[62]

Just as in painting, Cubist sculpture is rooted in Paul Cézanne'due south reduction of painted objects into component planes and geometric solids (cubes, spheres, cylinders, and cones). And just as in painting, it became a pervasive influence and contributed fundamentally to Constructivism and Futurism.

Cubist sculpture developed in parallel to Cubist painting. During the autumn of 1909 Picasso sculpted Head of a Woman (Fernande) with positive features depicted by negative space and vice versa. According to Douglas Cooper: "The first truthful Cubist sculpture was Picasso's impressive Woman's Caput, modeled in 1909–10, a counterpart in three dimensions to many like belittling and faceted heads in his paintings at the fourth dimension."[12] These positive/negative reversals were ambitiously exploited by Alexander Archipenko in 1912–13, for example in Woman Walking.[5] Joseph Csaky, after Archipenko, was the commencement sculptor in Paris to join the Cubists, with whom he exhibited from 1911 onwards. They were followed past Raymond Duchamp-Villon and then in 1914 by Jacques Lipchitz, Henri Laurens and Ossip Zadkine.[63] [64]

Indeed, Cubist construction was every bit influential equally whatsoever pictorial Cubist innovation. It was the stimulus behind the proto-Constructivist work of both Naum Gabo and Vladimir Tatlin and thus the starting-signal for the entire constructive trend in 20th-century modernist sculpture.[5]

Compages [edit]

Le Corbusier, Assembly building, Chandigarh, India

Cubism formed an important link between early on-20th-century art and compages.[65] The historical, theoretical, and socio-political relationships betwixt advanced practices in painting, sculpture and architecture had early on ramifications in France, Germany, the Netherlands and Czechoslovakia. Though there are many points of intersection between Cubism and architecture, simply a few straight links betwixt them tin exist drawn. Most often the connections are fabricated by reference to shared formal characteristics: faceting of grade, spatial ambiguity, transparency, and multiplicity.[65]

Architectural interest in Cubism centered on the dissolution and reconstitution of three-dimensional form, using simple geometric shapes, juxtaposed without the illusions of classical perspective. Diverse elements could be superimposed, made transparent or penetrate one another, while retaining their spatial relationships. Cubism had become an influential factor in the evolution of modern architecture from 1912 (La Maison Cubiste, by Raymond Duchamp-Villon and André Mare) onwards, developing in parallel with architects such as Peter Behrens and Walter Gropius, with the simplification of building design, the use of materials appropriate to industrial product, and the increased use of glass.[66]

Cubism was relevant to an architecture seeking a style that needed not refer to the past. Thus, what had get a revolution in both painting and sculpture was applied as office of "a profound reorientation towards a changed world".[66] [67] The Cubo-Futurist ideas of Filippo Tommaso Marinetti influenced attitudes in avant-garde compages. The influential De Stijl movement embraced the artful principles of Neo-plasticism developed by Piet Mondrian nether the influence of Cubism in Paris. De Stijl was also linked by Gino Severini to Cubist theory through the writings of Albert Gleizes. However, the linking of basic geometric forms with inherent dazzler and ease of industrial awarding—which had been prefigured past Marcel Duchamp from 1914—was left to the founders of Purism, Amédée Ozenfant and Charles-Édouard Jeanneret (better known as Le Corbusier,) who exhibited paintings together in Paris and published Après le cubisme in 1918.[66] Le Corbusier's ambition had been to translate the properties of his own style of Cubism to architecture. Between 1918 and 1922, Le Corbusier concentrated his efforts on Purist theory and painting. In 1922, Le Corbusier and his cousin Jeanneret opened a studio in Paris at 35 rue de Sèvres. His theoretical studies soon advanced into many dissimilar architectural projects.[68]

La Maison Cubiste (Cubist House) [edit]

Raymond Duchamp-Villon, 1912, Study for La Maison Cubiste, Projet d'Hotel (Cubist House). Epitome published in Les Peintres Cubistes, by Guillaume Apollinaire, 17 March 1913

Le Salon Bourgeois, designed by André Mare for La Maison Cubiste, in the decorative arts section of the Salon d'Automne, 1912, Paris. Metzinger's Femme à l'Éventail on the left wall

At the 1912 Salon d'Automne an architectural installation was exhibited that quickly became known as Maison Cubiste (Cubist House), with architecture by Raymond Duchamp-Villon and interior ornamentation by André Mare forth with a group of collaborators. Metzinger and Gleizes in Du "Cubisme", written during the assemblage of the "Maison Cubiste", wrote well-nigh the autonomous nature of art, stressing the point that decorative considerations should not govern the spirit of art. Decorative work, to them, was the "antithesis of the motion picture". "The truthful picture" wrote Metzinger and Gleizes, "bears its raison d'être within itself. It can be moved from a church building to a cartoon-room, from a museum to a written report. Substantially independent, necessarily complete, it need non immediately satisfy the mind: on the contrary, it should lead information technology, footling by picayune, towards the fictitious depths in which the coordinative light resides. It does non harmonize with this or that ensemble; it harmonizes with things in general, with the universe: information technology is an organism...".[69]

La Maison Cubiste was a fully furnished model business firm, with a facade, a staircase, wrought fe banisters, and two rooms: a living room—the Salon Bourgeois, where paintings past Marcel Duchamp, Metzinger (Woman with a Fan), Gleizes, Laurencin and Léger were hung, and a bedroom. It was an example of L'fine art décoratif, a abode within which Cubist fine art could be displayed in the comfort and style of modern, bourgeois life. Spectators at the Salon d'Automne passed through the plaster facade, designed by Duchamp-Villon, to the two furnished rooms.[lxx] This architectural installation was afterwards exhibited at the 1913 Armory Show, New York, Chicago and Boston,[71] listed in the catalogue of the New York exhibit every bit Raymond Duchamp-Villon, number 609, and entitled "Facade architectural, plaster" (Façade architecturale).[72] [73]

Jacques Doucet's hôtel particulier, 33 rue Saint-James, Neuilly-sur-Seine

The furnishings, wallpaper, upholstery and carpets of the interior were designed past André Mare, and were early examples of the influence of cubism on what would become Art Deco. They were equanimous of very brightly colored roses and other floral patterns in stylized geometric forms.

Mare chosen the living room in which Cubist paintings were hung the Salon Bourgeois. Léger described this proper noun as 'perfect'. In a letter to Mare prior to the exhibition Léger wrote: "Your idea is absolutely first-class for the states, really first-class. People will run across Cubism in its domestic setting, which is very of import.[2]

"Mare's ensembles were accepted as frames for Cubist works because they immune paintings and sculptures their independence", Christopher Green wrote, "creating a play of contrasts, hence the involvement not only of Gleizes and Metzinger themselves, simply of Marie Laurencin, the Duchamp brothers (Raymond Duchamp-Villon designed the facade) and Mare's quondam friends Léger and Roger La Fresnaye".[74]

In 1927, Cubists Joseph Csaky, Jacques Lipchitz, Louis Marcoussis, Henri Laurens, the sculptor Gustave Miklos, and others collaborated in the decoration of a Studio House, rue Saint-James, Neuilly-sur-Seine, designed by the architect Paul Ruaud and owned by the French mode designer Jacques Doucet, also a collector of Post-Impressionist and Cubist paintings (including Les Demoiselles d'Avignon, which he bought directly from Picasso's studio). Laurens designed the fountain, Csaky designed Doucet's staircase,[75] Lipchitz made the fireplace mantel, and Marcoussis made a Cubist carpet.[76] [77] [78]

Czech Cubist architecture [edit]

The original Cubist architecture is very rare. Cubism was applied to compages only in Bohemia (today Czech Commonwealth) and especially in its capital, Prague.[79] [80] Czech architects were the first and only ones to ever design original Cubist buildings.[81] Cubist architecture flourished for the most part between 1910 and 1914, just the Cubist or Cubism-influenced buildings were also built later Earth War I. Later on the war, the architectural style called Rondo-Cubism was developed in Prague fusing the Cubist compages with round shapes.[82]

In their theoretical rules, the Cubist architects expressed the requirement of dynamism, which would surmount the matter and at-home independent in it, through a creative idea, so that the result would evoke feelings of dynamism and expressive plasticity in the viewer. This should exist achieved by shapes derived from pyramids, cubes and prisms, by arrangements and compositions of oblique surfaces, mainly triangular, sculpted facades in protruding crystal-like units, reminiscent of the so-called diamond cutting, or even cavernous that are reminiscent of the late Gothic architecture. In this style, the entire surfaces of the facades including even the gables and dormers are sculpted. The grilles as well as other architectural ornaments reach a iii-dimensional form. Thus, new forms of windows and doors were likewise created, e. grand. hexagonal windows.[82] Czech Cubist architects also designed Cubist article of furniture.

The leading Cubist architects were Pavel Janák, Josef Gočár, Vlastislav Hofman, Emil Králíček and Josef Chochol.[82] They worked mostly in Prague but besides in other Maverick towns. The all-time-known Cubist building is the House of the Black Madonna in the Former Boondocks of Prague built in 1912 past Josef Gočár with the only Cubist café in the world, Grand Café Orient.[79] Vlastislav Hofman built the entrance pavilions of Ďáblice Cemetery in 1912–1914, Josef Chochol designed several residential houses nether Vyšehrad. A Cubist streetlamp has likewise been preserved near the Wenceslas Foursquare, designed by Emil Králíček in 1912, who also built the Diamond Business firm in the New Town of Prague around 1913.

Cubism in other fields [edit]

The influence of cubism extended to other artistic fields, outside painting and sculpture. In literature, the written works of Gertrude Stein employ repetition and repetitive phrases every bit building blocks in both passages and whole chapters. Most of Stein's important works apply this technique, including the novel The Making of Americans (1906–08). Not only were they the first important patrons of Cubism, Gertrude Stein and her brother Leo were likewise important influences on Cubism besides. In plow, Picasso was an of import influence on Stein's writing. In the field of American fiction, William Faulkner'due south 1930 novel As I Lay Dying can be read as an interaction with the cubist mode. The novel features narratives of the diverse experiences of xv characters which, when taken together, produce a single cohesive body.

The poets generally associated with Cubism are Guillaume Apollinaire, Blaise Cendrars, Jean Cocteau, Max Jacob, André Salmon and Pierre Reverdy. As American poet Kenneth Rexroth explains, Cubism in poetry "is the conscious, deliberate dissociation and recombination of elements into a new artistic entity made self-sufficient past its rigorous architecture. This is quite unlike from the gratis association of the Surrealists and the combination of unconscious utterance and political nihilism of Dada."[83] Nonetheless, the Cubist poets' influence on both Cubism and the later movements of Dada and Surrealism was profound; Louis Aragon, founding member of Surrealism, said that for Breton, Soupault, Éluard and himself, Reverdy was "our firsthand elder, the exemplary poet."[84] Though not as well remembered every bit the Cubist painters, these poets proceed to influence and inspire; American poets John Ashbery and Ron Padgett have recently produced new translations of Reverdy'southward work. Wallace Stevens' "Thirteen Means of Looking at a Blackbird" is also said to demonstrate how cubism'south multiple perspectives can be translated into poetry.[85]

John Berger said: "It is nearly impossible to exaggerate the importance of Cubism. It was a revolution in the visual arts as swell as that which took place in the early Renaissance. Its furnishings on later on fine art, on motion-picture show, and on architecture are already so numerous that we hardly discover them."[86]

Gallery [edit]

  • Pablo Picasso, 1913–14, Femme assise dans un fauteuil (Eva), Woman in an Armchair, oil on sail, 149.9 ten 99.four cm, Leonard A. Lauder Cubist Collection

  • Pablo Picasso, 1918, Arlequin au violon (Harlequin with Violin), oil on canvas, 142 x 100.3 cm, The Cleveland Museum of Art, Ohio

  • Gino Severini, 1919, Bohémien Jouant de Fifty'Accordéon (The Accordion Player), Museo del Novecento, Milan

Press articles and reviews [edit]

  • (centre) Jean Metzinger, c.1913, Le Fumeur (Human being with Pipage), Carnegie Museum of Art, Pittsburgh; (left) Alexander Archipenko, 1914, Danseuse du Médrano (Médrano Two), (right) Archipenko, 1913, Pierrot-carrousel, Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum, New York. Published in Le Petit Comtois, 13 March 1914

  • Paintings by Fernand Léger, 1912, La Femme en Bleu, Woman in Blue, Kunstmuseum Basel; Jean Metzinger, 1912, Dancer in a café, Albright-Knox Fine art Gallery; and sculpture by Alexander Archipenko, 1912, La Vie Familiale, Family Life (destroyed). Published in Les Annales politiques et littéraires, northward. 1529, 13 Oct 1912

  • Paintings past Gino Severini, 1911, La Danse du Pan-Pan, and Severini, 1913, Fifty'autobus. Published in "Les Annales politiques et littéraires", Le Paradoxe Cubiste, 14 March 1920

  • Paintings past Gino Severini, 1911, Souvenirs de Voyage; Albert Gleizes, 1912, Man on a Balustrade, 50'Homme au balcon; Severini, 1912–xiii, Portrait de Mlle Jeanne Paul-Fort; Luigi Russolo, 1911–12, La Révolte. Published in "Les Annales politiques et littéraires", Le Paradoxe Cubiste (continued), n. 1916, 14 March 1920

  • Jean Metzinger, c.1911, Nature morte, Compotier et cruche décorée de cerfs; Juan Gris, 1911, Study for Man in a Café; Marie Laurencin, c.1911, Testa ab plechs; August Agero, sculpture, Bust; Juan Gris, 1912, Guitar and Glasses, or Banjo and Spectacles. Published in Veu de Catalunya, 25 April 1912

  • Umberto Boccioni, 1911, La rue entre dans la maison; Luigi Russolo, 1911, Souvenir d'une nuit. Published in Les Annales politiques et littéraires, i December 1912

  • Francis Picabia, paintings published in the New York Tribune, 9 March 1913. Picabia held his showtime one-man show in New York, Exhibition of New York studies by Francis Picabia, at 291 art gallery (formerly Fiddling Galleries of the Photograph-Secession), March 17 - April 5, 1913

Meet also [edit]

  • Fourth dimension in art
  • Precisionism
  • Proto-Cubism
  • Rayonism
  • Department d'Or

References [edit]

  1. ^ Jean Metzinger, Annotation sur la peinture, Pan (Paris), October–November 1910
  2. ^ a b Christopher Greenish, MoMA collection, Cubism, Introduction, from Grove Art Online, Oxford Academy Printing, 2009 Archived 2014-08-13 at the Wayback Machine
  3. ^ Cubism: The Leonard A. Lauder Collection, The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, 2014 Archived 2015-05-17 at the Wayback Car
  4. ^ Christopher Green, MoMA drove Cubism, Origins and awarding of the term, from Grove Art Online, Oxford University Press, 2009 Archived 2014-06-xiii at the Wayback Car
  5. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k fifty yard n o p q r Christopher Green, 2009, Cubism, MoMA, Grove Fine art Online, Oxford University Press Archived 2014-08-13 at the Wayback Machine
  6. ^ Joann Moser, Jean Metzinger in Retrospect, Pre-Cubist works, 1904–1909, The University of Iowa Museum of Art, J. Paul Getty Trust, University of Washington Press 1985, pp. 34–42
  7. ^ Hajo Düchting, Orphism, MoMA, Grove Art Online, Oxford University Press, 2009
  8. ^ Magdalena Dabrowski, Geometric Brainchild, Heilbrunn Timeline of Fine art History, The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, 2000
  9. ^ a b Christopher Light-green, 2009, Cubism, Meanings and interpretations, MoMA, Grove Fine art Online, Oxford University Press, 2009 Archived 2015-07-02 at the Wayback Machine
  10. ^ Christina Lodder, 2009, Constructivism, Formation, 1914–21, MoMA, Grove Art Online, Oxford University Press, 2009 Archived 2008-10-24 at the Wayback Auto
  11. ^ Honour, H. and J. Fleming, (2009) A Earth History of Art. 7th edn. London: Laurence Rex Publishing, p. 784. ISBN 9781856695848
  12. ^ a b Douglas Cooper, "The Cubist Epoch", pp. 11–221, 232, Phaidon Printing Limited 1970 in clan with the Los Angeles County Museum of Art and the Metropolitan Museum of Art ISBN 0-87587-041-4
  13. ^ a b c Cooper, 24
  14. ^ Louis Vauxcelles, Exposition Braques, Gil Blas, 14 November 1908, Gallica (BnF)
  15. ^ a b Danchev, Alex (March 29, 2007). Georges Braque: A Life. Penguin Books Limited. ISBN9780141905006 – via Google Books.
  16. ^ Futurism in Paris – The Avant-garde Explosion, Centre Pompidou, Paris 2008
  17. ^ Louis Vauxcelles, Le Salon des Indépendants, Gil Blas, 25 March 1909, Gallica (BnF)
  18. ^ D.-H. Kahnweiler. Der Weg zum Kubismus (Munich, 1920; Eng. trans., New York, 1949)
  19. ^ C. Greenberg. The Pasted-newspaper Revolution, ARTnews, 57 (1958), pp. 46–9, 60–61; repr. equally 'Collage' in Art and Culture (Boston, 1961), pp. 70–83
  20. ^ Berger, John (1969). The Moment of Cubism . New York, NY: Pantheon. ISBN9780297177098.
  21. ^ a b "Fondation Gleizes, Chronologie (in French)" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on Nov 12, 2008.
  22. ^ "Gil Blas / dir. A. Dumont". Gallica. March 18, 1910.
  23. ^ Daniel Robbins, Jean Metzinger: At the Center of Cubism, 1985, Jean Metzinger in Hindsight, The University of Iowa Museum of Art, J. Paul Getty Trust, University of Washington Printing
  24. ^ a b c Guillaume Apollinaire, Les Peintres cubistes: Méditations esthétiques (Paris, 1913)
  25. ^ "Eiffel Tower". The Guggenheim Museums and Foundation. Archived from the original on Feb 28, 2014.
  26. ^ "The Wild Men of Paris". www.architecturalrecord.com. Archived from the original on April 24, 2016.
  27. ^ a b "Eccentric School of Painting Increases Its Vogue in the Current Art Exhibition --- What Its Followers Endeavor to Do". Oct eight, 1911. Archived from the original on March five, 2016 – via NYTimes.com.
  28. ^ a b "The "Cubists" Dominate Paris' Fall Salon, The New York Times, October 8, 1911 (High-resolution PDF)" (PDF).
  29. ^ Philadelphia Museum of Art, Marcel Duchamp, Nude Descending a Staircase, No. two Archived 2017-09-18 at the Wayback Machine
  30. ^ "Statens Museum for Kunst, National Gallery of Denmark, Jean Metzinger, 1911–12, Woman with a Equus caballus, oil on canvass, 162 × 130 cm". Archived from the original on January fifteen, 2012.
  31. ^ a b Mark Antliff and Patricia Leighten, A Cubism Reader, Documents and Criticism, 1906–1914, University of Chicago Press, 2008, pp. 293–295
  32. ^ Carol A. Hess, Manuel de Falla and Modernism in Spain, 1898–1936, University of Chicago Press, 2001, p. 76, ISBN 0226330389
  33. ^ Commemoració del centenari del cubisme a Barcelona. 1912–2012, Associació Catalana de Crítics d'Fine art – ACCA
  34. ^ Mercè Vidal, 50'exposició d'Art Cubista de les Galeries Dalmau 1912, Edicions Universitat Barcelona, 1996, ISBN 8447513831
  35. ^ David Cottington, Cubism in the Shadow of War: The Avant-garde and Politics in Paris 1905–1914, Yale Academy Press, 1998, ISBN 0300075294
  36. ^ "Exposició d'Art Cubista". Dalmau Galleries.
  37. ^ Joaquim Folch i Torres, Els Cubistes a cân Dalmau, Pàgina artística de La Veu de Catalunya Archived 2018-04-22 at the Wayback Machine (Barcelona) eighteen Apr 1912, Any 22, núm. 4637–4652 (sixteen–thirty abr. 1912)
  38. ^ Joaquim Folch y Torres, "El cubisme", Pàgina Artística de La Veu, La Veu de Catalunya, 25 Apr 1912 (includes numerous articles on the artists and exhibition)
  39. ^ a b William H. Robinson, Jordi Falgàs, Carmen Belen Lord, Barcelona and Modernity: Picasso, Gaudí, Miró, Dalí, Cleveland Museum of Art, Metropolitan Museum of Art (New York), Yale University Printing, 2006, ISBN 0300121067
  40. ^ Cubist extravaganza, Esquella de La Torratxa, Núm 1740 (3 maig 1912)
  41. ^ a b "[Exposició d'Fine art Cubista - Noticiero Universal]". Dalmau Galleries.
  42. ^ Jaime Brihuega, Las Vanguardias Artísticas en España 1909–1936, Madrid. Istmo.1981
  43. ^ "Le Journal". Gallica. October 5, 1912. Archived from the original on September 4, 2015.
  44. ^ a b Journal officiel de la République française. Débats parlementaires. Chambre des députés, 3 Décembre 1912, pp. 2924–2929. Bibliothèque et Archives de l'Assemblée nationale, 2012–7516 Archived 2015-09-04 at the Wayback Machine. ISSN 1270-5942
  45. ^ Patrick F. Barrer: Quand l'art du XXe siècle était conçu par les inconnus, pp. 93–101, gives an account of the debate.
  46. ^ "biography". www.peterbrooke.org.u.k.. Archived from the original on May 22, 2013.
  47. ^ "Albert-Gleizes-œuvre". September 18, 2007. Archived from the original on 2007-09-18.
  48. ^ a b "The History and Chronology of Cubism, p. five". Archived from the original on March 14, 2013.
  49. ^ "La Section d'Or, Numéro spécial, nine Octobre 1912". Archived from the original on April 3, 2017.
  50. ^ Cooper, 20–27
  51. ^ a b c d eastward f g Robbins, Daniel (April 19, 1964). "Albert Gleizes, 1881-1953 : a retrospective exhibition". [New York : Solomon R. Guggenheim Foundation] – via Cyberspace Archive.
  52. ^ Louis Chassevent, Les Artistes Indépendants, 1906, Quelques Petits Salons. Paris, 1908. Chassevent discussed Delaunay and Metzinger in terms of Signac's influence, referring to Metzinger's "precision in the cut of his cubes..."
  53. ^ a b Robert Herbert, Neo-Impressionism, The Solomon R. Guggenheim Foundation, New York, 1968
  54. ^ A. Gleizes and J. Metzinger. Du "Cubisme", Edition Figuière, Paris, 1912 (Eng. trans., London, 1913)
  55. ^ "Mercure de France : série moderne / directeur Alfred Vallette". Gallica. Dec one, 1912. Archived from the original on September four, 2015.
  56. ^ a b Cottington, David (April nineteen, 2004). Cubism and Its Histories. Manchester University Press. ISBN9780719050046. Archived from the original on Jan one, 2016 – via Google Books.
  57. ^ Christopher Dark-green, Cubism and Its Enemies: Modern Movements and Reaction in French Art, 1916–1928 Archived 2016-01-01 at the Wayback Auto, Yale University Press, New Oasis and London, 1987, ISBN 0300034687
  58. ^ "The Museum of Modern Art". Moma.org. Retrieved 2011-06-11 .
  59. ^ Kolokytha, Chara; Hammond, J.M.; Vlčková, Lucie. "Cubism". Routledge Encyclopedia of Modernism.
  60. ^ Archive, Asia Art. "Cubism in Asia: Unbounded Dialogues – Report". aaa.org.hk . Retrieved 2018-12-22 .
  61. ^ Gris, Juan. "Portrait of Pablo Picasso". The Art Establish of Chicago . Retrieved 2021-06-07 .
  62. ^ Pablo Picasso, 1909–ten, Caput of a Woman, bronze, published in Umělecký Mĕsíčník, 1913 Archived 2014-03-03 at the Wayback Machine, Blue Mount Project, Princeton University
  63. ^ Robert Rosenblum, "Cubism," Readings in Art History two (1976), Seuphor, Sculpture of this Century
  64. ^ Balas, Edith (April nineteen, 1998). Joseph Csáky: A Pioneer of Modern Sculpture. American Philosophical Society. ISBN9780871692306. Archived from the original on January 1, 2016 – via Google Books.
  65. ^ a b Architecture and cubism. Centre canadien d'architecture/Canadian Centre for Architecture : MIT Printing. April xix, 2002. OCLC 915987228 – via Open WorldCat.
  66. ^ a b c "The Collection | MoMA". The Museum of Mod Art. Archived from the original on April v, 2012.
  67. ^ P. R. Banham. Theory and Design in the Kickoff Machine Age (London, 1960), p. 203
  68. ^ Choay, Françoise, le corbusier (1960), pp. 10–11. George Braziller, Inc. ISBN 0-8076-0104-7
  69. ^ "Albert Gleizes and Jean Metzinge, except from Du Cubisme, 1912" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on June 2, 2013.
  70. ^ La Maison Cubiste, 1912 Archived 2013-03-thirteen at the Wayback Auto
  71. ^ Kubistische werken op de Armory Show Archived 2013-03-xiii at the Wayback Machine
  72. ^ "Item of Duchamp-Villon's Façade architecturale, 1913, from the Walt Kuhn Family papers and Armory Show records, 1859-1984, bulk 1900-1949". www.aaa.si.edu. Archived from the original on March xiv, 2013.
  73. ^ "Catalogue of international exhibition of modern art: at the Armory of the Lx-ninth Infantry". Association of American Painters and Sculptors. Apr xix, 1913 – via Internet Archive.
  74. ^ Dark-green, Christopher (January 1, 2000). Fine art in France, 1900-1940. Yale University Press. ISBN0300099088. Archived from the original on November xxx, 2016 – via Google Books.
  75. ^ Green, Christopher (2000). Joseph Csaky's staircase in the home of Jacques Doucet. ISBN0300099088. Archived from the original on xxx April 2016. Retrieved eighteen December 2012.
  76. ^ Rex, Aestheticus (14 April 2011). "Jacques Doucet'southward Studio St. James at Neuilly-sur-Seine". Aestheticusrex.blogspot.com.es. Archived from the original on 27 March 2013. Retrieved 18 December 2012.
  77. ^ Imbert, Dorothée (1993). The Modernist Garden in French republic, Dorothée Imbert, 1993, Yale University Press. ISBN0300047169. Archived from the original on xxx April 2016. Retrieved 18 December 2012.
  78. ^ Balas, Edith (1998). Joseph Csáky: A Pioneer of Modern Sculpture, Edith Balas, 1998, p. 5. ISBN9780871692306. Archived from the original on thirty April 2016. Retrieved 18 December 2012.
  79. ^ a b Boněk, Jan (2014). Cubist Prague. Prague: Eminent. p. nine. ISBN978-80-7281-469-5.
  80. ^ "Cubism". www.czechtourism.com. CzechTourism. Archived from the original on sixteen October 2015. Retrieved 1 September 2015.
  81. ^ "Cubist architecture". www.radio.cz. Radio Prague. Archived from the original on 11 September 2015. Retrieved 1 September 2015.
  82. ^ a b c "Czech Cubism". www.kubista.cz. Kubista. Archived from the original on 8 Oct 2015. Retrieved i September 2015.
  83. ^ Rexroth, Kenneth. "The Cubist Verse of Pierre Reverdy (Rexroth)". Bopsecrets.org. Archived from the original on 2011-05-19. Retrieved 2011-06-11 .
  84. ^ Reverdy, Pierre. "Title Page > Pierre Reverdy: Selected Poems". Bloodaxe Books. Archived from the original on 2011-05-27. Retrieved 2011-06-eleven .
  85. ^ "Untitled Document". Archived from the original on 2007-08-thirteen. Retrieved 2008-04-07 .
  86. ^ Berger, John. (1965). The Success and Failure of Picasso. Penguin Books, Ltd. p. 73. ISBN 978-0-679-73725-four.

Further reading [edit]

  • Alfred H. Barr, Jr., Cubism and Abstract Art, New York: Museum of Mod Fine art, 1936.
  • Cauman, John (2001). Inheriting Cubism: The Bear on of Cubism on American Art, 1909–1936. New York: Hollis Taggart Galleries. ISBN0-9705723-four-four.
  • Cooper, Douglas (1970). The Cubist Epoch. London: Phaidon in association with the Los Angeles County Museum of Art & the Metropolitan Museum of Fine art. ISBN0-87587-041-4.
  • Paolo Vincenzo Genovese, Cubismo in architettura, Mancosu Editore, Roma, 2010. In Italian.
  • John Golding, Cubism: A History and an Analysis, 1907-1914, New York: Wittenborn, 1959.
  • Richardson, John. A Life Of Picasso, The Cubist Insubordinate 1907–1916. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1991. ISBN 978-0-307-26665-1
  • Marking Antliff and Patricia Leighten, A Cubism Reader, Documents and Criticism, 1906–1914, The University of Chicago Printing, 2008
  • Christopher Green, Cubism and its Enemies, Modern Movements and Reaction in French Art, 1916–28, Yale Academy Press, New Haven and London, 1987
  • Mikhail Lifshitz, The Crunch of Ugliness: From Cubism to Popular-Art. Translated and with an Introduction by David Riff. Leiden: BRILL, 2018 (originally published in Russian by Iskusstvo, 1968)
  • Daniel Robbins, Sources of Cubism and Futurism, Art Periodical, Vol. 41, No. iv, (Wintertime 1981)
  • Cécile Debray, Françoise Lucbert, La Section d'or, 1912-1920-1925, Musées de Châteauroux, Musée Fabre, exhibition catalogue, Éditions Cercle d'art, Paris, 2000
  • Ian Johnston, Preliminary Notes on Cubist Architecture in Prague, 2004

External links [edit]

  • Cubism, Heilbrunn Timeline of Art History, Metropolitan Museum of Art
  • Cubism, Agence Photographique de la Réunion des musées nationaux et du Thousand Palais des Champs-Elysées (RMN)
  • Czech Cubist Architecture
  • Cubism, Guggenheim Collection Online
  • Alphabetize of Historic Collectors and Dealers of Cubism, Leonard A. Lauder Research Center for Modern Art, Metropolitan Museum of Art
  • Elizabeth Carlson, Cubist Way: Mainstreaming Modernism after the Arsenal, Winterthur Portfolio, Vol. 48, No. 1 (Spring 2014), pp. i–28. doi:ten.1086/675687

dotsonsuallible.blogspot.com

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cubism

0 Response to "What Art Style Influenced Pablo Picassos Table in Front of the Window"

Enregistrer un commentaire

Inscription à : Publier les commentaires (Atom)

Iklan Atas Artikel

Iklan Tengah Artikel 1

Iklan Tengah Artikel 2

Iklan Bawah Artikel